AUTO THEFT FORENSICS

 

The training we offer is not dry and boring. In fact we encourage audience participation.  The format is easy to understand and a huge reference book is given to all students. This information is not complicated and relies more on common sense.  Many of our lectures are accompanied by “show and tell” of actual locks, computer modules and other components we have removed from vehicles.

 

If you have ever been involved in an auto theft case and been party to either the “Forensic” report, or testimony from the experts, you would find many of the terms and strategies they use are hollow. After going to this course, you should have a full understanding that vehicles are easy to steal. You will find that the “Anti Theft Systems” don’t always protect the vehicle from being stolen.  The information supplied is not biased and gives you the opportunity to look at both sides of the issue. Not just one side, which is prevalent now.  You will learn what is valid and what is “junk science” such as the “last key used” process.

 

Our advantage is that we have worked on all sides of this issue. We supply the actual statements made by the experts that cannot be backed up with scientific provable fact.  In medical terms known as “Differential Diagnoses.”

 

 

·        What do you know about auto theft, owner give ups and burned vehicles? 

 

·        Do you know what the forensic expert is looking for, or should be looking for, in a forensic examination of a vehicle, the vehicle security system or a lock from a vehicle? 

 

·        How about if the vehicle is totally burned?  What is the “forensic expert” looking for in an examination?

 

·        Do you know what a vehicle fire investigator is looking for and what is needed to determine the origin and cause of a vehicle fire?

 

·        Do you know the methodology that should be followed so an examination can be made without the alteration or destruction of possible forensic evidence? 

 

·        Does the methodology used by the “expert” determine if the entire body of forensic evidence can be available for court or only the evidence that support the theories of the “expert”?

 

·        Is what that expert on the opposing side saying correct?  Was the proper methodology used in the examination?   Is the expert using “smoke and mirrors” to justify his position or is all the available evidence being put forth?

 

·        When questioning an expert at a deposition or trial do you know what questions to ask to elicit the information you want and do you understand the responses?

 

This course is designed for attorneys and judges to teach them the standards and protocols that should be used by an “expert” during an examination.  It is designed to give the attorneys, judges and the courts a clear set of protocols and methodologies by which to evaluate the “expert”.  This will enable the judges and attorneys to make an informed decision as the creditability and qualifications of the their own and the opposing “expert” witness.  It will also assist judges in the performance of their duty as a “gatekeeper” under Daubert.

 

The course is designed to take a neutral stance toward insurance fraud.  It simply presents the standards and protocols that should be followed by ALL “experts” in ALL examinations. 

 

For District Attorneys who prosecute criminal cases and criminal defense attorneys it a MUST. 

 

For the attorneys that represent clients who have sued an insurance company it will show them what is lacking in the opposing side’s case and show them areas to attack the opposing side’s “expert” their case at a deposition or in court.

 

For attorney’s who represent insurance companies it will show them where their cases are weak and can be attacked by opposing counsel because their expert didn’t do a complete and through examination.  It will show the attorney where the “holes” are in insurance company’s case and the case can be referred back to the “expert” or SIU investigator to plug the “holes”.

 

Although this course is designed for attorneys and judges, insurance company SIU supervisors and SIU investigators are encouraged to attend.  This course will teach them what is needed for an attorney can take an auto theft case based on a forensic examination to court.

 

Unlike previously requested by others, this is NOT an inclusive lock analysis class. There is far more to know than just the condition of the ignition lock.

 

For details contact Rob at 1-414-238-4805 or Robo14@aol.com

 

Home