The Credibility Game
I have been accused (without my name being mentioned) by http://www.forensicauto.net of being dilusional of a conspiracy theory. What I am going to do is lay out my case here so that you can be the judge. If I didn't have (others have it too in the event something happens to me) all the documentation I do in all honesty, I would not believe it either.
The paper trail is very damning and obviously they were either too stupid or too arrogant to cover their tracks. All it requires is connecting the dots which is what will be done on this site for you as the public to make an informed decision. Please be aware that the information here is only a partial portion of the total case against the co-conspirators and some has to be saved for further litigation effects.
Now, if only one fact is listed it may look one way, but if these facts are put together you will see what the legitimate forensic examiners and the insurance attorneys have done to my personal reputation. They can't beat me on my knowledge so they go personal. They only use half truths to attack me and don't give the whole picture. If they are not truthful on their website, one has to wonder if their report content is truthful as well.
The experts that contribute to these personal attacks are people we have prevailed in court cases over 60 times because of their incompetence.
This particular story involves an opposing Indiana attorney that was working for State Farm that appears to have used what is known as plan B. Plan B is a term used in criminal defense cases in which you accuse anyone else to being involved in the crime to protect the defendant. Such an example is to blame the wife for the homicide even though you know there are no such facts to support it.
It is my opinion that Mr. Kramer used plan B on me. The reason was to protect State Farm (his client) in the civil case Klajajic vs. State Farm, he needed me to be equalized. His first option was to go to the judge on a motion to get me disqualified to testify in the case. This back fired and the judge found me acceptable as an expert to testify on my two affidavits and that my deposition testimony was accepted as well.
During the deposition, Mr. Kramer had 18 of my previous depositions that he tried to use out of context for the case at hand. That was not real successful for him either.
I have every reason to believe he knew I was in federal bankruptcy court the day before, which I why I believe he used this for plan B to destroy my credibility.
Now, why would I go on the internet and write about a personal thing such a this? Because they forced me to. I filed for personal bankruptcy protection for two reasons. One was that these corrupt experts have done everything possible to slander and libel me (one such article in which I am personally named, will be addressed in other web pages) which had cost my company almost all business. The second is that I am in poor physical health. So bad that I am now on Social Security disability.
Now, it is very interesting that an anonymous letter was sent about me to one of my creditors dated July, 2007 which then went to the bankruptcy trustee. The dep was taken at the end of May of 2007. No one knew the contents of the deposition but my client attorney and Mr. Jack Kramer and whoever Kramer shared this information with. At that time, no other copies of the deposition had been ordered. The letter states "contact Jack Kramer" with his phone number. This kind of locks Mr. Kramer in as being responsible for having my bankruptcy reopened and it really does not matter who sent the anonymous letter. These facts, put the depo in his hands.
I know for a fact, that members of the Coalition Network of Forensic Examiners are known for their anonymous letters, because I have received many on different individuals.
Now, if you go to http://www.forensicauto.net you will see a paragraph in red addressing me, not by name, but I am easily identified from their statements. It says I was a tow truck driver. I don't even remember sitting in a tow truck in my life. It states there is an expert that had his bankruptcy discharged and reopened and is now under federal investigation. I am not aware of such an investigation and from what I can tell so far, the trustee has never checked my tax records or bank records and the only evidence I am aware of that she has is this anonymous letter and the deposition pages listed here. Not much of a case against me. There are only two options here. Either the trustee is on power trip and is not in touch with reality and is on a witch hunt or the other option I hope is not true, where she is in State Farm's pocket.
It is real brazen for me to say this, but all the facts, reveal what has happened here that they went personal. To try to confuse my financial dealings between corporate gross amounts and my personal income was just down right low, but then again, the insurance companies and the opposing experts need me out of the way, so they can continue their corrupt practices against innocent insureds in order to deny a claim.
Also on that site, they state this expert is looking for investors. It says don't invest in his faltering business. If you go to another page on their site about experts, you will see where they accuse an expert of claiming $0 income in bankruptcy court but pocketed $250,000-$300,00. My question is: Which is it? Do I have $300,000 or is my business faltering. Which is it? Can't have it both ways!
The biggest difference between them and me is that as you will see, I can prove everything I state. They can't!
You are about to enter the world of corruption and obfuscation of the truth in order to ruin a high profile expert's credibility and to win a case at any cost. You may think this stuff only happens in the movies. Many movies are based on real stories. You may not phantom believing that such issues happen in real life, but the facts are laid out for you.
This page addresses Mr. Kramer (State Farm's independent councel) and what he had done to me either on his own or with State Farm's assistance.
The next case I will address will really scare you where a California District attorney appears to have co-conspired with a so-called professional organization to ruin my credibility in front of a jury. This case appeared to be more about the experts than the defendant. The DA actually had to go shopping for an expert because he did not feel confident with the guy who examined the car. Can I prove this? Yes!
These attorneys will do anything to win no matter what the cost! The truth does not seem to matter. If you think that case is scary, I have more for you in which the case was totally built around the condition of the ignition lock. The case I am referring to is State of California vs. Youngbloode. I can't make this stuff up and yet it happens everyday! There is evidence tampering, manufacture of evidence--unbelievable!
Here is the "evidence" that the trustee has that reopened my bankruptcy and put my life on hold for 6 months so far. In fact, this has created a problem for me getting divorced and I cannot refinance my house to buy her out. On November 7, 2007 on a telephone conversation, even the federal judge said the trustee had no evidence, but he had to let her re-open the case. This could go on for 20 years because there is no end date and my personal life is left on hold.
The truth has been so totally twisted here with the deliberate confusion between the gross income of Rob Painter & Associates Inc. without considering sub-contractor fees, hotels, airlines, rental cars etc. and my personal income where I made nothing. The numbers don't lie, but the way this was presented all are lies.
Also included was my company's standard retainer agreement that lists Rob Painter as being the expert in a case. All checks are issued not under my social security number, but the firm's Employer's Identification number and deposited in the corporate bank account.
There was an accusation or inferred by the bankruptcy court because of this that I personally had been retained by the insurance company in the case Klajajic vs. State Farm. That is a blatant lie because my firm can't represent both parties in the case. The fee amount was for corporate deposition time, hotel, fuel and other expense, not for retention and that invoice will be placed up on this site too!
Am I bitter about all of this? No, because it was expected because I pose a very real threat to the insurance companies and experts I oppose.
Can't seem to get PDF to run here and I need to get this information out.
Deposition attack on my business income and my personal income
Where is the perjury and the admission I was withholding funds?
One other note here: If Mr. Kramer thought I committed perjury, as much as he tried to confuse this issue, you can bet he would have gone to thejudge or the prosecution to have charges pressed on me. Instead, they used the back door to attack my personal credibility. This is the same tactics the use against an insured when denying payment. They go out of thir way to infer the insured was involved with the theft, even though they can't prove it. They don't have to!